|
|
|
School
Choice and Parental Freedom: By Bruce D. Purdy, CHEO
Executive Director NEW definition of public school: Part I
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the parent’s
“fundamental right” to direct the upbringing and education of their
child. “The child is not the mere creature of the State;
those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right and the high duty,
to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.” “This primary role of the parents in the upbringing
of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring tradition.” In the same breath, however, it created an “interest”
the State has in education. The
State’s interest is that the child be “literate” and
“self-sufficient”. State must meet “compelling interest” test in
overriding a parent’s fundamental right to home educate.
There are four parts:
The U.S. Supreme Court then requires the State, not the parents, to prove the following:
The article referenced below has articulated what I believe to be the State’s view in reference to parental rights/child’s rights/State rights. Testing the Boundaries of Parental Authority over
Education: The Case for Home Schooling The
Ohio Constitution provision for education: The General Assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation, or otherwise, as, with the income arising from the school trust fund, will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state: but no religious or other sect, or sects, shall ever have any exclusive right to, or control of, any part of the school funds of this state.
|
|
|